Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 6,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2020, 12:09 pm by Elisabeth R. Connell
Morris of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a notable opinion in the case of Rosenberg v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Lomanto had provided his written permission for the children to travel with their mother to the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
It sustained the ruling of the lower court, finding that the state’s policy of segregating whites and Blacks in education did not violate the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
The order’s focus faces outward towards the alien residents of the subject countries, not inward towards persons in the United States like the plaintiffs . . . . [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 2/26/10Cite: Viad Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:32 am by Ashley Deeks
” Assume that the United States could attribute these kinetic operations to Iran with a very high degree of certainty. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by Gene Quinn
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:38 am by Holly Brezee
Currently, 36 states permit medical cannabis use, and of that number, 18 permit some degree of recreational use. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am by Katherine McCoy
Pietras On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:16 am by Heather Whiteman Runs Him
She noted that this is a “common fact pattern” and is consistent with the facts underlying the court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the meantime, on 30 June 2010 the defendant through his newly retained counsel, AF filed a Criminal Procedure Law 440 motion (1) praying the Court for retroactive application to his case of a recent United States Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]