Search for: "Dennis v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 1,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm by lawmrh
” Irony of ironies, the same year that Professor Fairman had his F-bomb article published in Volume 28 of the Cardozo Law Review, members of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, notably Chief Judge Dennis G. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
” The piece emphasises the need for an Anonymisation Unit and training. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
, (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (more from Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Harold Wegner), Global101 reasons for not selling your unused trade marks: (IPKat),ICANN to battle domain name tasting: (Trademark Blog), (related coverage from Trademark Blog),Is a patent a monopoly? [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am by Michael Lowe
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311, 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1948); Woodward v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:16 pm
  The case has been pending for several years before Second Circuit Court Judge Denny Chin under Authors Guild v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
Austin & Dennis Klimchuk, eds., Private Law and the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm by Joseph Margulies
” In the national security assessment of 2009, Dennis Blair, then the director of national intelligence for the Obama administration, reported that the threat of terrorism was no longer the greatest risk facing the United States, a position he repeated in 2010. [read post]
11 May 2007, 8:45 am
Moreover, Chevron failed to demonstrate that it was subjected to inequitable or non-uniform taxation in violation of the equal protection rights guaranteed in the Wyoming and United States constitutions.Affirmed.J. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Michael O'Hear
  On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]