Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 901 - 920 of 2,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 5:58 am
  In AFFIRMING the lower court's order granting summary judgment to Merchants, the Fourth Department held: "Where[, as here,] the provisions of an insurance contract are clear and unambiguous, they must be enforced as written' " (Oot v Home Ins. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:40 am by Nicole Vinson
This provision does not cover expenses incurred for the services of any public adjuster. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Tests for determining the “arbitrability” of Taylor Law contract provisionsOdessa-Montour CSD v Odessa-Montour Teachers Asso., 271 AD2d 931The Odessa-Montour decision by the Appellate Division, Third Department applied the guidelines set out in the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Watertown City School District v Watertown Education Association, 93 NY2d 132. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:21 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Oregon issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Doe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am by Amy Howe
The ACA set up a system to reimburse the insurers who lose money on these policies for some of their losses, but when Congress later restricted the funds available to the Department of Health and Human Services to pay the insurers, the insurers went to court. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
After her former insurance agent retired, a new agent allowed the insurance to lapse in 2005. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:52 pm
Co., 87 NY2d at 315), in the insurance contract context, an insured may pursue a claim for consequential damages, as plaintiff does here, based on defendants' claimed breach of the covenant of good faith.* * * * *Here, as in both Panasia Estates, Inc. v Hudson Ins. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:17 pm by Ben Vernia
Their complaint alleged that defendants failed to diagnose their childrens’ condition, but billed Tricare - the Department of Defense’s insurance program - for those procedures. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:21 am
Village of Elmsford KINGS COUNTY Insurance Law Court Denies Insurer's Motion to Stay Actions, Arbitrations to Collect Payment from Insurer New York Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]