Search for: "Doe v. Department of Health & Human Services"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
That is why the Review of Child Care Law (Department of Health and Social Security, 1985)) and the white paper, The Law on Child Care and Family Services (Cm 62, 1987), which led up to the Children Act 1989, rejected the suggestion that a child could be taken from her family whenever it would be better for her than not doing so. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that “[t]he Charter does not confer a freestanding constitutional right to health care. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Creates New Department of Talent and Economic Development - Gov. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:09 pm
All states have regulations requiring health care providers to report cases of listeriosis and public health officials try to interview all persons with listeriosis promptly using a standard questionnaire about high risk foods. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The much-awaited Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
One of the named parties, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell and her entourage of a few aides and security personnel passed through. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:10 am
The audit was overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS OIG), but also involved a private company, AdvanceMed Corporation (AdvanceMed), working for HHS OIG as a contractor, as well as an outside consultant, Deloitte Financial Advisory Services, LLP (Deloitte) working for defendant. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
At the end of the day, however, caring for people requires the human touch. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:02 pm
Although the dire predictions were credited by the court of appeals below as a reason for accepting the interpretation of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), King, supra, 759 F.3d at 374-75, they ignore evidence of related experience and do not account for potential actions by the states that have not set up exchanges, by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), or by Congress. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:19 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:42 am
The IRS’s interpretation accomplishes that goal: Section 1401 can still be read literally because the section that authorizes the federal exchanges, Section 1321, provides that if a state does not establish an exchange under Section 1311, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “shall . . . establish and operate such Exchange within the State. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:21 am
The unit utilizes Legal Services within the Department of Justice. 8. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
This was made clear in the BC Health Services case. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
But does it have any teeth, really? [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
In the enforcement arena, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and state attorneys general pursued enforcement action during 2014 against companies that had suffered data breaches. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
” The Exchange provision, he continued, makes States mere “subdivisions of the federal government” because it “requires states to establish these exchanges or says that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will step in and do it for them. [read post]
