Search for: "Doe v. Queen"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
A similar story was recently told before Mrs Justice Slade in the Queens Bench Division in Arthur J Gallagher Services and others v Skriptchenko and Others [2016] EWHC 603. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
How does the parliamentary system account to itself from out of the apparatus it itself has fashioned to further its own supremacy? [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am
We previously covered the cases of Budis v Skoutelas, Short Form Order, Index No. 702060/13 [Sup Ct, Queens County July 16, 2014] and Pappas v 38-40 LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 30329(U) [Sup Ct NY County Feb. 22, 2018], in which the court held that the estate of a deceased LLC member had no standing to assert derivative claims on the LLC’s behalf. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 11:40 am
The Fuzzy-Animal Exclusion Texas authorities have concluded that slot machines or eight-liners are considered lottery, specifically in Queen v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 8:57 am
From Yelling v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 8:29 am
Won v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
The application of these principles is illustrated by the recent decision in Global BC v The Queen [2010] BCCA 169. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
The necessity of this information is obviated if plaintiff does not have a cause of action against the criminal defendant. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
The United Kingdom does not do very well – with particular attention being drawn to the availability of ministerial warrants and medical databases with centralised registries. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Carel, 668 F.3d 1211 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) SORNA does not violate Commerce Clause United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 11:30 am
New York, Brooklyn and Queens Public Library Systems Join Campaign Mayor Bloomberg also announced that the New York, Brooklyn and Queens Public Libraries have joined the campaign to reduce chronic absenteeism and improve educational outcomes for the students in their communities. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
., v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am
Global BC v The Queen [2010] BCCA 169 is an interesting case concerning media access to evidence in criminal trials. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
That does not seem to be a result to be promoted. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:44 pm
See Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
In Valard Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
The court file does not indicate that such motions were made nor the nature of the motions to be made. [read post]
