Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 104,991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2019, 3:50 pm
S. 83; Brooke v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
, IO Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.), held that State sovereign immunity does not preclude institution of inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
Bode or State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
A copy of the opinion in Hageman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:33 pm
It's like Clinton v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:31 am
Proskauer Rose v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:31 am
Proskauer Rose v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:38 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
While it does not enable a copyright owner to recover monetary damages from a state or state actor, Ex parte Young does allow a copyright owner to obtain an injunction against the individual state employees who are responsible for the infringement. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The same constitutional challenge was made in 2014 in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:02 pm
And, offering a different perspective, at National Review’s “Bench Memos” blog, Carrie Severino has a post titled “Does Brett Kavanaugh Want to Overrule United States v. [read post]