Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 901 - 920
of 12,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2016, 11:37 am
This does not mean, however, that the lien is perfected. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:55 am
Access Copyright does not comment on what may happen were the Board to conclude that such posting triggers the first right but not the second. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
How Does This Affect My Company? [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 12:30 am
On November 27, 2023, the examiner issued a decision rejecting the requested trade mark under Article 7(1)(e)(iii) and Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of the EUTMR essentially on the basis that:a) the mark is simply a combination of presentation features, with an upper view shape and a realistic flat lower surface with feathers, eyes, and beams, which consumers would perceive as typical of the products in question; b) the shape does not… [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
," Thomson Reuters Foundation News, 27 Dec. 2017 [text]Year in Review: The Refugee Crisis in 2017 (Refugees Deeply, Dec. 2017) [text]Blog posts:Can International Frameworks or Compacts Reduce Onward Migration? [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:31 am
Mistake 1: Being Unaware of Your Family’s Finances In many marriages, one person does the majority of the financial planning. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:55 am
So is the answer -1? [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:30 am
Under Article 164(1) EPC the Implementing Regulations are an integral part of the Convention and, hence, are equally binding to the Boards of Appeal of the EPO (Article 23(3) EPC) and to national courts.In combined cases G 2/12 and G 2/13 (“Tomato II” and “Broccoli II”), the Enlarged Board of Appeal had concluded – taking into account the legislative history of Article 53(b) and Rule 27(b) EPC as well as of Article 4 of Directive 98/44/EC – that… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:53 am
Jan. 27, 2022) Plaintiff alleged that defendants Oorah, Kars4Kids, and JOY violated the FAL and UCL “because, contrary to what their advertisements say and suggest, (1) their charity efforts benefit not all children, but primarily Orthodox Jewish children in New York and New Jersey, (2) some of the charitable donations received go toward risky real estate investments, and (3) much of the charitable donations received go toward paying Defendants’ operating costs. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
State 2017 Rank 2018 Rank 2019 Rank 2020 Rank Change from 2019 to 2020 Alabama 14 11 12 18 -6 Alaska 29 25 35 46 -11 Arizona 11 15 13 6 7 Arkansas 30 32 34 23 11 California 16 13 17 22 -5 Colorado 42 35 40 43 -3 Connecticut 21 19 23 21 2 Delaware 3 3 3 3 0 Florida 2 2 2 2 0 Georgia 35 38 38 39 -1 Hawaii 24 27 26 28 -2 Idaho 46 46 48 48 0 Illinois 38 42 42 40 2 Indiana 10 10 11 25 -14 Iowa 34 34 33 35 -2 Kansas 12 12 15 14 1 Kentucky 48 47 47 49 -2 Louisiana 9 4 4 4 0 Maine… [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
§ 1295(a)(1).By a vote of 2-1, the CAFC found D. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:48 am
Such seller does not have any apparent interest in indicating an incorrect ‘Date First Available’. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm
Halderman, 451 U.S. 1 (1981), written by then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:16 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 8:48 am
That is precisely what the Board issupposed to do.Comment: in the textFirst, SFC argued in its petition that "Arakane teaches (i) that the [HT] compound can be an arylamine compound corresponding to Formula (V) of claims 1 and 13, (ii) that the [ET] compound can be anthracene derivatives corresponding to Formulas (I) and (II) of claims 1 and 13, and (iii) that the [HT] compound and [ET] compound are mixed in the organic light emit-ting medium. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 8:22 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
10 May 2015, 7:31 pm
” On April 27, 2015, Judge Christina Reiss of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
On October 27, 2011, the appellant was informed by the RS that the divisional application was not being processed as the parent application had been withdrawn. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:43 am
Specifically, ALJ Rogers determined that the accused Kodak products do not infringe (1) claims 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 of the ‘964 patent, and (2) claims 15, 27, 30, and 38 of the ‘911 patent. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:38 pm
Ziegler (case 1/13). [read post]
