Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 901 - 920 of 5,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
(b) Three states levy mandatory, statewide, local add-on sales taxes at the state level: California (1%), Utah (1.25%), and Virginia (1%). [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:46 am by INFORRM
Part 1 of this post was published on 6 July 2021 and Part 2  on July 2021 Part 1 of this post was published on 6 July 2021 and Part 2 was published on 7 July 2021. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:00 am by Jonathan Pyzer B.A., L.L.B.
Before this legislation was enacted, applicants were only subject to a five-year background check. 2020 Federal Firearms Ban On May 1, 2020, the federal government banned more that 1,500 models and variants of “assault-style” weapons. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[18] Why does the law preclude the companies from doing this—even when they're not monopolies, such as landline companies might be,[19] but are highly competitive cell phone providers? [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
§§ 233(b), (c)(1) exclusion of "indecent" communications). [7] Pacific Gas & Elec. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
, (Law and History Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 361-367 (2021)).Gabriella Gimigliano, Banking Contracts and Sharia Rules within the European Union Framework, (Open Review of Management, Banking, and Finance, 2019, 1-17).Thomas Aronsson, Olof Johansson‐Stenman & Ronald Wendner, Charity, Status, and Optimal Taxation: Welfarist and Non-Welfarist Approaches, (June 9, 2021).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Symposium on “Halakhah: The Rabbinic Idea of Law”, Vallinova Law… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:10 pm by Anthony Carbone
In that case, they can be convicted under the state’s refusal statute (N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
The company does business worldwide, but has the bulk of its operations in Asia and the Middle East. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:41 am by Matt Murphy
§ 39-71-703(2) (2011) disallowing impairment awards to injured workers with a Class I impairment and no wage loss did not violate Equal Protection. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 7:52 am by admin
The Rule 104(a) standard does not require perfection. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm by Patricia Hughes
(Decision #1, para.1) Decision #1 described Justice McLeod’s background based on an Agreed Statement of Facts. [read post]