Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
Surely there will be more as long as capital punishment remains part of our penal law.4 And so, in 1972, the United States joined other modern industrial nations in abolishing the death penalty. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am
(See Benitez v United Homes of N. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2020, 74 million voters from across the United States voted for Trump. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
The City prevailed on all issues but the general plan consistency issue pertaining to whether or not the City properly “coordinated” with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
Depos v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:34 am
Ann. 1-19-102 (2009) that a corporate officer, if there is one in the state, respond to the levy with “a certificate under his hand stating the number of rights or shares which the defendant holds . . .[,]” and that only if there is no officer within the state, the agent is to provide such information. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:43 am
The Office of the Attorney General of the United States and the Office of the Attorney General of Texas are independent prosecutorial agencies dedicated to enforcing federal and state criminal laws, respectively. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
S. 133, 136 (1955); see United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
The Oaths Act, ch. 1, 1 Stat. 23, § 1 states: That the oath or affirmation required by the sixt [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 11:43 am
Here is the Summary of the Argument as presented in the brief: SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The Appointments Clause provides for appointment of officers of the United States by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
Hormel, Hormel Law Office, LLC, Spokane, WA) United States v. [read post]
