Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes" Results 901 - 920 of 3,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm by MorelliRatner
“The class in this case, I agree with the Court, should not have been certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:51 pm by MorelliRatner
On the ruling, and on the most recent studies on implicit bias:Colorlines/Rinku Sen: “Wal-Mart Gets a Free Pass For Bias From the Supreme Court” A higher burden for the class action “commonality” requirement:read more [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On April 6, 2011, the New York Times had this editorial, and on April 10, 2011, the San Francisco Chronicle had this opinion piece. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm by Steven G. Pearl
NPR is running this story from the Associated Press and this report -- noting the different reactions from the Court's male and female Justices -- from analyst Nina Totenberg. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
When the original ruling came down from the Supreme Court, a majority of the discussion regarding Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Consequential damages have been a cornerstone of contract doctrine since the broken crankshaft in Hadley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:55 pm by Legal Talk Network
Dukes, to the court’s rejection of a ban on violent video games, Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:50 am by Lawrence Solum
Christopher Slobogin (Vanderbilt Law School) has posted Making the Most of Jones v. [read post]