Search for: "English v. English"
Results 901 - 920
of 9,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
Now there are two further English possession cases at the 'questions to the parties' stage of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:46 am
Even these trials – which often tend to reduce costs overall, and are usually short hearings in themselves – may routinely give rise to costs of £25,000 per side (Price v MGN [2019] 1 WLR 1464). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:58 am
In the recent judgment, AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC [2011] EWCA Civ 647, the Court of Appeal held that an anti-suit injunction can be granted to restrain foreign proceedings brought in breach of an English arbitration agreement, even in the absence of an actual, proposed or intended arbitration.The dispute arose out of a concession agreement to produce hydroelectric energy between the state of Kazakhstan government (D) and a US… [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:05 am
This is nothing more than would generally have been expected in terms of current English law. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
It is an ordinary English word and should be construed as such. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 12:22 pm
The Fleets’ appellate brief demonstrates mastery of English but a natural – and commendable – unfamiliarity with legalese. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:00 pm
Voter access issues, discrimination, and barriers to equal access for voters with disabilities and for voters with limited English proficiency continue today. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:37 am
It is Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:29 am
The case is Lungowe and Others v Vedanta Resources Plc and Another. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:26 pm
English and International Case Law The court reviewed relevant English and international case law, noting that English authorities have consistently interpreted the time bar as applying to misdelivery claims. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:38 am
(Involnert Management Inc v Aprilgrange Ltd and Others [2015] EWHC 2225 (Comm)) [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
While the Court is correct that the Constitution’s Patent Clause “ ‘was written against the backdrop’ ” of English practice, ante, at 14 (quoting Graham v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm
On the same day that the Court issued its ruling in the California case, it also issued its opinion in a case called United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 12:04 pm
Circuit in PHH v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:02 pm
Calvo-Goller v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:03 am
See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 7:27 pm
v=ke6fiJ3g2Co&feature=youtu.be&a [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
In February this year, the English courts appeared finally to have woken up to the arrival of the Rome II Regulation, with the first published decision addressing its provisions. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:55 am
Earlier this month Judge Birss QC handed down his judgement in the Patents County Court case of Temple Island Collections Limited v New English Teas Limited and Nicholas Houghton. [read post]
