Search for: "English v. English" Results 901 - 920 of 9,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm by Amy Howe
On the same day that the Court issued its ruling in the California case, it also issued its opinion in a case called United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:26 pm by Malcolm Hartwell
English and International Case Law The court reviewed relevant English and international case law, noting that English authorities have consistently interpreted the time bar as applying to misdelivery claims. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am by Giles Peaker
It is an ordinary English word and should be construed as such. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:38 am by Patrick Bracher
(Involnert Management Inc v Aprilgrange Ltd and Others [2015] EWHC 2225 (Comm)) [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:55 am
Earlier this month Judge Birss QC handed down his judgement in the Patents County Court case of Temple Island Collections Limited v New English Teas Limited and Nicholas Houghton. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:26 am
The English High Court, in Loyaltrend Limited and Sye Razvi v Brit UW Limited & Others [2010] EWHC 425 (Comm), ruled in favour of the Second Defendant (Brit) because the Claimants failed to notify the insurer in a timely manner as specified in the policy.The Claimants insured property (a shop) under a continuous insurance policy from 2002 to 2006 through its broker. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:26 am
The English High Court, in Loyaltrend Limited and Sye Razvi v Brit UW Limited & Others [2010] EWHC 425 (Comm), ruled in favour of the Second Defendant (Brit) because the Claimants failed to notify the insurer in a timely manner as specified in the policy.The Claimants insured property (a shop) under a continuous insurance policy from 2002 to 2006 through its broker. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:23 am by michael
R v Ahmed; [2010] WLR (D) 219 “The act of procuring the miscarriage of a woman’s child did not, by itself, amount to an offence known to English law. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am by Andrew Dickinson
In February this year, the English courts appeared finally to have woken up to the arrival of the Rome II Regulation, with the first published decision addressing its provisions. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 1:41 pm by Erin
Language rights are very important in Canada as a result of the historical French-English tension. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:36 pm by and
The traditional approach taken by the English Courts to restrictive covenants was confirmed in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Prophet plc v Huggett [2014] EWCA Civ 1013. [read post]