Search for: "Fanning v. Fanning" Results 901 - 920 of 4,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:06 am
Somewhat controversially, Streams became part of Google Health in November 2018.Not a huge fan of streamsDeepMind’s application was refused by the Examiner on the basis of (i) lack of distinctiveness (Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR); and (ii) descriptiveness (Article 7(1)(c)). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  What makes ransomware attacks so devastating is that many variants do not simply target individual endpoints, but rather establish a foothold on one device and then fan out across a corporate network, encrypting everything from shared drives and email servers to website platforms and backup servers. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 6:01 pm by Sam Brunson
As recently as 2012, though, the Supreme Court reiterated (in NFIB v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:08 am
Terrence Ferguson is a rapper better known by his fans as ‘2 Milly’. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by Daniel Murphy
As a fan of sci-fi (when the day comes that I can pay in “units” I’ll be truly happy), I cannot imagine a future that doesn’t abandon traditional monetary systems. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:16 am
Given the amount of wisdom it imparts, it is exceptionally good value.David's particular bugbears are evident including the fact that designs only protect visual features (not those experienced by other senses) and the identity of the informed user (for the few unfamiliar, he's not a fan of the approach taken in the infamous pogs case PepsiCo, Inc. v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic SA. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 10:38 am by Eric Goldman
This case provides a fascinating look into the rough-and-tumble world of publicity rights damages. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]