Search for: "Fee v. Fee" Results 901 - 920 of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2024, 1:01 am by Felix Le Roux
The case is Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors and Others v East Rand Member District of Chartered Accountants and Others (945/2022; 40/2023) [2024] ZASCA 114 (22 July 2024). [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:19 pm by Mike Scarcella
Last month, Justice attorneys said the plaintiffs’ lawyers should receive $30.4 million for their work in the suit, Keepseagle v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:31 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s news from Paul Weiss (memos on this case are posted in the “Securities Litigation” Practice Area): In an opinion that may dramatically change the landscape of stockholder litigation, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld – in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:59 pm by emagraken
In today’s case (Holness Law Group Professional Law Corporation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff submitted evidence establishing the reasonable value of its services (see Kwangjin Song v Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, 55 AD3d 1278 [2008]) and defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to plaintiff’s entitlement to the fees sought (see DiPlacidi v Walsh, 243 AD2d 335 [1997]; Pirro & Monsell v Freddolino, 204 AD2d 613 [1994], lv dismissed 85 NY2d 903 [1995]). [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by Francis Pileggi
In deciding an issue of first impression, the Delaware Court of Chancery in City of Miami General Employees’ and Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust v. [read post]
A traditional PAC is different than the much newer super PAC, created by the Court of Appeals case Speechnow v. [read post]