Search for: "Flowers v. Flowers"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2011, 10:49 am
Here is SCOTUSBlogs summary of Fowler v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
(TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are flowers and flower pots related goods? [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:26 pm
(Flowers v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:21 am
Chrisman v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:17 am
It has been a long cold winter, but we are now beginning the May month of flowers – one of my favorite times of year because it’s all about new growth. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:52 am
Solis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:29 am
In today’s case (Charlie v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:06 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:58 am
Victims generally also can ask the court to order that all contact, whether by telephone, notes, mail, fax, email or delivery of flowers or gifts, is prohibited (`no contact’ provisions). [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:00 am
Flowers, 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
See Nobelman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:10 am
On March 15, the European Court of Justice delivered its first ruling on Article 6 of the Rome Convention in Koelzsch v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:01 am
In March 2009, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, issued an opinion in Tristani v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm
On March 2, 2011, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of Allstate Insurance Company based upon a Complaint for declaratory relief in the case of Allstate v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
Springtime is the time for flowers, which makes it totally appropriate that the first little buds should begin to appear in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:03 pm
At each intersection you could hear the roar of V-Twins echoing off the buildings. read more [read post]
