Search for: "Givens v. Clarke"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
First, there was the judgment of Mr Justice Tugendhat in the case of Andre v Price [2010] EWHC 2572 (QB) – given on 11 October 2010. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future probably… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future probably… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
This seems to me to be the clearly correct result, given the Supreme Court’s decision in Clark v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
In Katz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
In a speech entitled “General, Equal and Certain: Law Reform Today and Tomorrow”, given at the Lord Renton Lecture 2011, Lord Neuberger made the case for reconsidering codification in order to achieve clearer statute law. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
Another case, Duncan v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
On December 7, the Court will hear argument in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
It also appears the grant of (interlocutory) injunctions for patent infringement in Australia may well be increasingly influenced in the future by the sorts of issues highlighted by the US Supreme Court in KSR v Teleflex (although that case was not referred to). [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
This is the second in a series, discussing the two new Bills proposed in Congress to deal with online pirates and counterfeiters. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:40 am
The 1972 case of Hanover Insurance Company v. [read post]
Florida Supreme Court Holds Court Not Arbitrator Determines Whether Agreement Violates Public Policy
23 Nov 2011, 10:57 am
In Shotts v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Hill and Gertz v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:22 pm
See Graham v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am
Lord Clarke set out the court’s position on the costs issue. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
His reasons will be given at a later date. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 5:33 pm
And given that Clark v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:30 pm
This is especially so given the Supreme Court’s decision in Clark v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
In Canada, given the lack of depth in the financial marketplace generally and in the relative number of possible competitive strategic buyers in any given industry (as compared to that of the U.S.), it is not uncommon for one or a small number of bids to be received. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:58 pm
The decision seems generally quite right to me, given Clark v. [read post]
