Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL v. US "
Results 901 - 920
of 1,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2014, 6:29 pm
As gathered in this volume, their work product endorses new undertakings, new abstentions from established ALI projects, and particular responses to developments in varied corners of the law. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
It will always be an issue of what is best for employees v. what is in the best interest of the employers business. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:17 pm
The Bureau took issue in this case with claims suggesting that the use of skin cream could lead to weight loss. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:13 pm
The Bureau took issue in this case with claims suggesting that the use of skin cream could lead to weight loss. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
The case is that of Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch). [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 4:21 am
*See Geduldig v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Part II examines supply chain’s use of letters of intent. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/IYshH2yBdc -> Failed $4.4 billion bid for Nortel patents comes back to haunt Google and friends on Halloween http://t.co/dHv1GVvyGq -> How to account for exploitation of a recording Straw & Anor v Jennings & Ors [2013] EWHC 3290 (Ch) (01 November 2013) http://t.co/yuBcJDnGsy -> Is Antigua the puurrrrrrfect home for the CopyKat? [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Advertising-based content distribution patent fails Bilski test: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
Publishers responded by claiming that if England were a better, more egalitarian society, he'd have more than enough readers at home to compensate.What if Dickens had succeeded in getting the US to the international table, 40 years before the Berne Convention? [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm
v=5J67xJKpB6c, that imagines what air travel would be like if airlines worked like health care. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
It is true that section 2(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998 requires us only to “take into account” decisions of the ECtHR. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:26 am
Hardy & Maile v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:17 am
The Supreme Court has just issued its decision in Horne v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
R (B) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14-15 Nov 2017. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
Karen Partanen v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
Karen Partanen v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
Karen Partanen v. [read post]
