Search for: "Herring v. Commissioner"
Results 901 - 920
of 3,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2014, 4:56 am
Lane v Commissioner of Environmental Protection, 2014 WL 4814520 (CT 10/7/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR314/314CR89.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
On Tuesday 8th February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
In its decision, Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 7:02 am
However, if she does not report her minor patients and their parents, she faces “civil and criminal penalties [and] the loss of her license. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
To conclude, in the words of Elizabeth Denham, her Office’s work in this area is clearly far from over, as serious concerns continue to be raised about the use of a technology and its reliance on huge amounts of sensitive personal information. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
Vestager's going to be nearing the end of her second term as competition commissioner. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:56 am
Pennington v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Only service of the petition and related papers an individual authorized by the agency head to accept service constitutes proper serviceMatter of Lowney v New York State Division of Human Rights, 2009 NY Slip Op 30270(U), February 4, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 108754/07, Judge: Walter B. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:02 am
”Accordingly, Justice Tolub denied Lowney’s motion to renew and/or reargue her petition seeking additional relief. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Anson v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 30 April 2015. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or… [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or… [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:03 am
Matter of Clifford v Kelly, 58 AD3d 432.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:22 am
Disciplinary probationFeliciano v Safir, Supreme Court, [Not officially reported]Garnett v Safir, 253 A.D.2d 700, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 92 N.Y.2d 817The Feliciano Case:Although the specific events underlying the Feliciano case are but rarely encountered, the decision demonstrates that an employee’s “disciplinary probation status” may follow the individual to a new agency upon his or her transfer if the new employer wishes to condition the… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:28 am
Challenging not being selected for a provisional appointmentCameron v Church, 309 AD2d 747 Is an individual entitled to a court order directing his or her provisional appointment or promotion to a position if there is proof that the reason for the applicant's nonselection was bias on the part of the individual making the employment decision? [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:50 pm
On Wednesday, December 29, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in King v. [read post]
