Search for: "Holmes v. Holmes" Results 901 - 920 of 1,876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 12:55 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
”  That’s what courts have done since Marbury v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:05 pm by Bridget Crawford
Holm | Volume 58 | Page 215 -Bridget Crawford Feminist Law Professors [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:08 am by Tom Smith
Holmes used his "fire in a theater" line to justify the abusive conviction and incarceration. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Third, Justice Holmes’s opinion in Pennsylvania Coal Company v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm by Michael Wasserman
 According to one appellate court in California, the answer seems to be yes.RIS Media reported today on a California appellate court decision earlier this week (Holmes v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:28 pm by nflatow
Six long years had passed since the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:23 pm
Wright, Antitrust Analysis of Category Management: Conwood Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
” – featuring Brink Dickerson of Troutman Sanders; Chris Holmes of E&Y; Deb Kelley of Genesis; and Dave Lynn of TheCorporateCounsel.net and Morrison & Foerster… When Stars Collide: CEOs v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:30 pm
I'm struck by how close his words are to what Justice Holmes said in Bleistein v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:03 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Thursday, July 26, 2012: Husband of Justice Lori Douglas calls her 'victim' in sex scandal Justice Scalia Disputes Accuracy Of 'Leak'  Corneau v Eriksen: Establishing Willful Non-Compliance in a Contempt Motion Scotland announces plans to legalize same-sex marriage Robert Scoble's Visit With Kevin O'Keefe and LexBlog Global Commission on HIV and the Law Report on Risks, Rights &… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:28 am by David Bernstein
Upholding contractual freedom against a New York statute that limited the hours that bakers might work, the decision has been reviled by both liberals and conservatives as an egregious example of judicial malfeasance — cited today most often for the prescient dissent of the sainted Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
The legal principle is known as the law in Holme v Brunskill. [read post]