Search for: "Howard Bashman"
Results 901 - 920
of 932
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2006, 11:00 pm
As predicted here, Judge Posner sealed the fate of UAL’s retired pilots by rejecting their challenge to UAL’s confirmed plan (and thanks to How Appealing’s Howard Bashman for his post declaring this blog's prediction "correct" following issuance of the opinion). [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 9:41 pm
In addition to some prior reactions noted here, folks looking for the blogosphere's various takes on Jeff Skilling's sentence of 24+ years can check out these posts: Dave Hoffman here at Concurring Opinions Norm Pattis here at Crime & Federalism Peter Lattman here at the WSJ Law Blog UPDATE: Howard Bashman now has all the major media coverage of the Skilling sentence linked here. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:53 pm
Bashman -How Appealing here (esp)... [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 2:41 pm
As well reported by Howard Bashman here, Judge Sim Lake sentenced Jeff Skilling at the low end of the (now advisory) 2000-era Guidelines range by imposing a sentence of 292 months of imprisonment (That's 24 years and 4 months for those not good at dividing quickly by 12.) [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
In today's Wall Street Journal [thanks to Howard Bashman for the link], John Yoo correctly emphasizes that the primary impact of the Military Commissions Act is, as Jack has explained, to attempt to eliminate any judicial checks on the Executive's conduct of the conflict against Al Qaeda: Congress and the president did not take the court's power grab lying down. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 11:52 am
Howard Bashman -- of How Appealing fame -- wrote an essay entitled, "Text This: Words Alone Can Violate Federal Obscenity Laws," which appears on law.com. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
Howard Bashman's Law.com column this month is called, "How Many Issues Should You Raise on Appeal? [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 9:42 pm
UPDATE: Garrow's piece is now online here, thanks to Howard Bashman. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 11:04 pm
Thanks to Howard Bashman at How Appealing for bringing to my attention the Third Circuit's reissued opinion in the case of Petruska v. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 9:39 am
" (Howard Bashman linked it, so you can access it at least temporarily — I've mentioned the link rot issue before — from his post.) [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:08 am
" Professor Orin Kerr on the nomination Howard Bashman on the nomination Patently-O on Judge Moore Patently-O predicting Judge Moore The main question now is: What will David Lat say in his new tabloid: Above the Law. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 5:51 pm
Howard Bashman reports that Professor Judge Moore is now the youngest member of the federal appellate bench. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 10:54 am
(Thanks to Howard Bashman for the link.) [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 7:32 am
Bloggership: How Blogs Are Transforming Legal Scholarship April 28, 2006 The Many Faces of Law Professor Blogs Papers Larry Ribstein (Illinois; Ideoblog): The Public Face of Scholarship Ann Althouse (Wisconsin; Althouse): Why a Narrowly Defined Legal Scholarship Blog Is Not What I Want: An Argument in Pseudo-Blog Form Christine Hurt (Illinois; Conglomerate) & Tung Yin (Iowa; The Yin Blog): Blogging While Untenured and Other Extreme Sports Commentators Howard Bashman (How… [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 12:15 pm
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they speak to top blawggers, Attorney Denise Howell, whose blawg is Bag and Baggage, Attorney Ernie Svenson, who writes “Ernie the Attorney” and Attorney Howard Bashman, whose blawg is entitled “How Appealing. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 12:15 pm
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they speak to top blawggers, Attorney Denise Howell, whose blawg is Bag and Baggage, Attorney Ernie Svenson, who writes "Ernie the Attorney" and Attorney Howard Bashman, whose blawg is entitled "How Appealing. [read post]
1 Aug 2006, 6:00 am
" Id. at 20; see also Howard Bashman, "Viewing Law Blogs as a Vast Amicus Brief," Law.com (July 24, 2006) ("When the legal blogosphere offers assistance in the form of insightful commentary about pending cases from law professors and lawyers with particular expertise in the subject matter under consideration, a judge's consultation of those blog posts is, in my view, just another form of permissible legal research. [read post]
28 Jul 2006, 6:09 pm
" That is the question Howard Bashman of How Appealing addresses today in his weekly commentary on Law.com. [read post]
22 Jul 2006, 5:29 am
Howard Bashman has this interesting article at law.com on whether appellate judges should be allowed/encouraged to look at blawgs related to substantive matters in pending cases. [read post]
2 Jun 2006, 9:16 am
Howard Bashman at How Appealing linked to this Slate article about the difficulties faced by public defenders all across the country. [read post]
