Search for: "Hunt v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 1,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2010, 7:29 pm by Frank Pasquale
United States District Court to justify their own decisions to hear the case. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
The court noted that the group would have to prove that at least one individual in the group had “standing to sue in their own right,” as required under Hunt v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) In the free speech / dogfighting video case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am by Kent Scheidegger
Finally, it appears that the United States Supreme Court is prepared to clean up one of the messier areas of its jurisprudence, the question of when a state procedural default rule is an "adequate" ground for decision, precluding federal review of the underlying question. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
   The argument was mentioned in Fayed v United Kingdom ((1994) 18 EHRR 393) and it was accepted in Rotaru v Romania ((2000) 8 BHRC 449 [44]). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:07 am by Elie Mystal
Maybe in his next life Balderas can try harder to be born in the right place so his quest to better himself won’t threaten to bring down the entire United States legal system. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:58 am by Dan
" This expectation is wrong in the United States and very wrong in China. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:35 am by Katherine Scanlon
Coventry contended that the Florida Viatical Settlements act, in as much as it purported to allow the Office authority over transactions occurring outside of Florida, violated the Dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am by Adam Chandler
Based on Justice Scalia’s questions in last week’s argument in Doe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Lyrissa Lidsky
As readers of this blog probably know by now, United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]