Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 901 - 920 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm by Law Lady
 Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Retirement benefits -- Settlement agreement -- Enforcement -- Wife's request for lump sum payment to effectuate award of wife's portion of husband's retirement and survivor benefits was appropriate where husband had purposefully and deceptively taken the entire benefit for himself and his current wife and flouted multiple trial court orders, his own… [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:27 pm by stan_sipple
Court of Appeals adds judgment interest of over $27000 to wife's judgment for almost $183000 from husband's 401k plan that was worth over $600000 when the husband took almost two years to file an acceptable QDRO. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:52 am
When the ancillary relief application went before him on the 6th April 2006 and the wife did not appear, the district judge, clearly frustrated by the wife's (in)action, made an order transferring all known assets to the husband, in an attempt to shock the wife into cooperating, despite the fact that the husband only sought an equal division of assets. [read post]
10 May 2009, 1:31 pm
Husband and wife are in their early sixties. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:32 am by Meriwether & Tharp
A husband and wife were divorced in Fulton County in 1997 and the wife was granted custody of the parties’ child. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Nimkoff v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:12 am by Sarah Riley Howard
   The Court of Appeals found that the original judge’s denial of the wifes motion to increase spousal support after her ex-husbands death was not palpable error and concluded that there was no basis for the successor judge to reconsider the motion. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:41 am
The New Jersey divorce judge was correct in denying the ex-wife's request for a plenary hearing on her allegation of the ex-husband's alleged non-disclosure and misrepresentation regarding his assets. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:57 am by James J. Gross
  Therefore the husbands contribution to acquisition of this property was equal to wifes, that is zero, and the trial court did not err in declining to grant him a monetary award. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:08 pm by Michael Steven Green
 Today's question: Assume that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that Pennsylvania’s prohibition on interspousal negligence actions does not apply to a suit by a New York wife against her husband concerning an accident in Pennsylvania. [read post]