Search for: "ILLINOIS v. WASHINGTON" Results 901 - 920 of 1,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2013, 5:31 am by Florian Mueller
In the Microsoft case it was key that the FRAND contract case had been brought in the United States approximately eight months before Motorola filed the related German lawsuits, and Motorola had offered, in a letter sent from Illinois to Washington State in 2010, a worldwide license covering its declared-essential H.264 and IEEE 802.11 patents, also listing the European counterparts of the relevant U.S. patents. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am by John Elwood
Washington when it disregarded the district court’s factual and credibility findings and excluded evidence in aggravation and the state’s rebuttal when it reversed the district court and granted habeas relief. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Biden Forum, Seema Nanda weighs in on Janus v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At SportsHandle, Ryan Rodenberg notes that in a “prediction market” run by a Washington, D.C. company that allows participants to bet on the outcomes of Supreme Court cases, including Christie v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am by Andrew Hamm
One of the term’s major cases was Janus v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143-44 n.12, 99 S.Ct. 421, 430-31 n.12, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create… [read post]