Search for: "IN RE MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY"
Results 901 - 920
of 976
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway CompanyState RoundupAL> DECIDED · Defendant wins all/part of 4 Motions in Limine in retaliation/discharge action in Taheri v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
" This was the day after Lisa had been expelled and toldthat she could not return unless accompanied by a parent. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
(Substituted opinion) U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 13, 2008 In re: Gallaher, No. 07-74593 In a criminal appeal arising from a district court's refusal to accept a conditional guilty plea, a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the refusal is denied but the matter is remanded for reassignment to a new judge to reconsider the conditional plea where: 1) under Fed. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
In re Adoption of the Unborn Child of B.W., 889 N.E.2d 1236 (Ind. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 5:12 am
An order denying return of seized property is not an appealable order. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Intellectual Property Marketing Advisor) (IP finance) New book lifts lid on IP value creation 'From Assets to Profits: Competing for IP Value and Return' (IAM) Open letter to World Customs Organisation concerning increased enforcement of intellectual property (IP Justice) Panel: WTO cross-retaliation could bring compliance but political pressure high (Intellectual Property Watch) Push continues for TRIPS biodiversity amendment, geographical… [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
., decided 10/16/2008)There's a lot in here, so be sure to read this decision if you're on the property side of the P&C equation.Jeweler's (or "jeweller's" if you're across the pond) block insurance is all-risk specialized insurance coverage for jewelers. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Kapelioujnvy, No. 073353 Conviction for conspiracy to sell stolen property is reversed where: 1) the government failed to prove that the defendant believed that the stolen property was worth at least five thousand dollars; and 2) the government failed to prove the defendant was involved in a conspiracy involving goods that moved in interstate commerce. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:39 am
Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 RE: Casitas Municipal Water Dist. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
" (In Re: ICS Cybernetics, Inc., 123 BR 467, 475-76 [Bktcy Ct, NDNY 1989], aff'd 123 BR 480 [NDNY 1990].) [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
In re: William B., 78 Cal.Rptr. 3d 91 (Cal. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:48 pm
I have no property and no car loans, etc. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Falso, No. 062721 Conviction for crimes relating to child pornography and traveling with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct with minors is affirmed where: 1) though the district court's finding of probable cause was not supported by a substantial basis, the district court nevertheless properly denied defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence seized from his home under the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule; 2) the district court was not knowingly or… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
You're not going to get to tell your story. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
Department of Justice, Prosecuting Intellectual Property Crimes Manual § II. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
He also argued that Perry's "belated" attempts to evaluate and propose to rent the property were irrelevant and improper on a motion for reconsideration. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:32 pm
Sabol had seen two individuals fleeing the house and was unaware whether they might return. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:38 pm
Mike Pickens made a Motion, which passed on a 3-2 vote, which simply re-stated the pertinent law - that no space will be dedicated to civic organizations unless that property is first declared surplus by the Board. [read post]
