Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 901 - 920
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
[Update] On Friday 4 November 2011, the Administrative Court (Elias LJ and King J) will hear an application for permission in the judicial review case of R (Decoulos) v Lord Justice Leveson. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 2:27 am
The report raises some interesting transparency points. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
Although written in March, it is an interesting read. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 11 August 2022, the Court of Appeal (Arnold LJ, Dingemans LJ and Warby LJ) gave judgment in Riley v Murray [2022] EWCA Civ 1146. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
It makes for interesting reading. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection The HawkTalk Blog has analysed the proposals in the DCMS consultation document, Data: a new direction, to change the “legitimate interests” in Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR so that the controller’s legitimate interests always prevails in a limited number of pre-defined circumstances. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
" (Waller LJ at [11]-[12] in R (McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2002] QB 1129). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
" (Waller LJ at [11]-[12] in R (McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2002] QB 1129). [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:12 am
I do not accept – I might be old fashioned – that if a story is in the public interest you can pay a public official to disclose information. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
Damages plus interest of £12,096.71 were awarded, and costs to the Hs.It was enforcement of this damages and costs order that the Ws sought to stay. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
If the judge were right, the procedural provisions for giving notices of breach would be, as Toulson LJ pointed out in argument, completely circumvented and rendered otiose. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Regarding the first issue, Lord Brown, with whom Lords Dyson and Walker agreed (Lord Kerr agreed with the result but for different reasons), held that the 2009/2010 care plan reviews did include a reassessment of Ms McDonald’s care needs for the reasons given by Rix LJ in the Court of Appeal at [53], namely: “53. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm
He did, however, hold that " Haringey was entitled to damages against Ms Hines for common law deceit and held that the measure was the amount of the discount, £38,000, which Ms Hines must pay back with interest (assessed at £20,822.30)". [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the decision of Arden LJ in Giles v Rhind, the Court of Appeal determined that ‘breach of duty’ is applicable to any legal wrongdoing. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm
He did, however, hold that " Haringey was entitled to damages against Ms Hines for common law deceit and held that the measure was the amount of the discount, £38,000, which Ms Hines must pay back with interest (assessed at £20,822.30)". [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
The Libel Reform campaign is dissatisfied with the statement and calls for an effective statutory public interest defence. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
Damages plus interest of £12,096.71 were awarded, and costs to the Hs.It was enforcement of this damages and costs order that the Ws sought to stay. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
The David Banks Media Law Blog has an interesting post on “Identifying children involved in crime” IMPRESS has published its annual report, 2017-2018. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:04 am
Judge Milligan ordered The Bank recover possession of the Property; Ms Pereira pay the Bank £298,183.60, being the sum loaned plus interest and costs; The sale and transfer of the Property be rescinded, and the title be rectified accordingly; and Ms Pereira pay damages to the Pains, such damages to be assessed following completion of the sale of the Property, and to include the Pains' costs of the proceedings A letter, apparently from Ms Pereira was sent on 5 July 2007, asking… [read post]
