Search for: "In Re Blake's Will"
Results 901 - 920
of 929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2007, 9:34 am
We're now "Lawyer 2 Lawyer. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:36 pm
"But we're as interested and as anxious to see this thing through as everyone else. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O'Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:42 am
Neither Jones, nor Apprendi, nor Ring, nor Blakely, nor Booker countenance this result. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 11:49 am
Part I of this Article looks at Blakely and its predecessors, and reviews how this line of cases has re-focused our attentions on the origins and legitimacy of facts in sentencing. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 11:31 am
Accordingly, this Article re-evaluates a variety of ancillary sentencing proceedings (including pre-sentence reports, prior offender statutes, probation, parole, post-release supervision and restitution) under Blakely. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 3:46 am
Which we carry with us when we re-join that march. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 11:11 am
Through our work with Catalyst, we're helping clients do just that. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 1:30 pm
Despite that decline, the number of criminal appeals in 2006 surpassed by more than 25% the number of filings in the years before the Court's decision in Blakely v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 10:32 am
And though I doubt Blakely will be made retroactive in Burton (basics here), I do expect a Supreme Court struggling to fill its docket to take up additional Blakely and Booker issues in the months ahead. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:19 am
Going into the Emerald Bowl game between UCLA and Florida State, our prognostication record based on predictions published previously here at LawPundit is 11-3 in picking winners and 8-3 against the spread (three of the games had no spread that we were able to find online).Update. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:22 am
The Court considered whether the claims were barred by res judicata which bars relitigation of issues raised and considered in a prior criminal proceeding. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 6:28 am
" Blake agrees. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:43 am
Why, if you're determining that sentences run consecutively, isn't that just the same as looking at a simultaneous conviction and saying they're going to run consecutively? [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:15 am
Another helpful reader has sent me this report on a notable state Blakely ruling in In re Personal Restraint of VanDelft, No. 77733-1 (Wash. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
"We're in the process of working on waiver language that's going to be including in pleas, and if people are going to be interested in these pleas, they're going to have to waive those rights," Allen County Prosecutor Karen Richards said. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 12:46 pm
Then, when a trial court misinforms someone that they are waiving they're right to appeal, there has been no voluntary, knowing, or intelligent waiver of the right to appeal a sentence. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
This case involves attempt to re-enter the U.S. case. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 6:46 am
In Voice of the Wave (re-printed in The Surfer's Journal), Tom Blake, one of the founders of modern surfing went further and suggested looking inside the wave itself and further still to the secrets it holds at an atomic level. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 6:42 am
Moments which engrave the soul; moments imprinted upon the memory before re-joining that march. [read post]
