Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 10:35 am
Will it aid or hinder the system's original aims and objectives? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
Will it aid or hinder the system's original aims and objectives? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:42 am
Will it aid or hinder the system's original aims and objectives? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
X were standing next to Ms. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:23 am
Thereafter, [he] wrote out a full-page statement regarding the theft of the laptop. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
“Speech” and “press” are stand-ins for the full range of human expression. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
What should its principal objects and its primary functions be? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:27 am
More than once recently, I’ve had reason to be involved in discussions regarding “victims” who do not wish to testify against their alleged abusers in domestic violence cases. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force then re-certified the above-specified issue. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The report chronicles the failure of my predecessor in the Bush Administration to listen to the objections of the JAG leadership about enhanced interrogation techniques, the result of which was that the legal opinion of one Lieutenant Colonel, without more, carried the day as the legal endorsement for stress positions, removal of clothing, and use of phobias to interrogate detainees at Guantanamo Bay,[1] Just before becoming President, Barack Obama told his transition team that the… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:39 pm
Marshall does not apply to claims at issue -- Even if it were determined that bankruptcy court lacks authority to enter final orders because trustee's fraudulent transfer claims are merely “related to” bankruptcy, court may still enter final orders because Section 157(c)(2), provides that a bankruptcy judge can issue final judgments in non-core proceedings if parties consent, and IRS explicitly and impliedly consented to bankruptcy court's final resolution of… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Judges could then issue orders to any U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:44 am
Re Comment 1: Pappas’ ad hominem attack and support of the cult of greed For some reason, people on the right (who by no means are all Republicans nor by any means all "greedy conniving bastards") tend to include a lot of people who think that accusing other people of name calling is a formidable response to substantive issues raised by uncertain information. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
Instead, the cases ordered disclosure under the traditional discovery principles of Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that is, `[p]arties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense,’ and that for purposes of discovery, `relevant’ evidence `need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
However, an employer can avoid paying fees if the court determines that it took “objectively reasonable efforts to draft the rejected or reformed restriction so that it would be presumptively reasonable. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
SUTTON PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. 2nd District.Child support -- Child custody -- Intervention -- Where Department of Revenue initiated proceedings to establish paternity and require father to pay medical support and child support; father filed petition seeking custody of child and child support from child's mother; custody petition was transferred to a new lower court case number; mother and father ultimately entered into agreement providing that father would consent to… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
I am going to try to meet some of your particular and sophisticated interests by building upon rather than merely restating what I told the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Law and National Security early last month in Washington. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
There is a reason the state chose the slower and far more burdensome preclearance route, through the district court in DC. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:49 pm
You're going to need those gloves. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
What is relevant is the reasonableness of the apprehension in that regard in the mind of the appellant. [read post]
