Search for: "In re Application of Wells"
Results 901 - 920
of 22,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
In re Ink Projects LLC, Serial No. 87856799 (March 15, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
The Board, however, pointed out for the umpteenth time that the mere descriptiveness determination is not a guessing game and that the proposed mark must be considered in relation to the goods.The proto-typical consumer of our legal test for mere descriptiveness is not blindfolded, but knows full well that applicant is not using the mark in connection with cars, software, phones, etc. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 6:30 am
" (The PTO has rejected the application). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:26 am
In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 116 USPQ2d 1406, 1411 (TTAB 2015) (citing In re Shell Oil Co., 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1689 (Fed. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:42 pm
In re Dikran M. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:19 am
See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453 (TTAB 2004). [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 3:42 am
Since applicant did not claim acquired distinctiveness, that was the end of the story. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
This will require that you provide the original certificate in your application. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Legal Applications of Marketing Theory, part 4 Steve Ansolbahahere & Jacob Gersen, Harvard University, Dept of Government & Harvard Law School, Consumer Confusion in the Law of Food (Are People Misled?) [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:40 pm
In response to this biometrics issue, the USCIS recently announced new guidelines for expeditious biometric appointment requests: If the applicant needs expedited processing, the Form I-131 instructions provide specific information for submitting pre-paid express mailers with your Form I-131 for USCIS to send your receipt and ASC appointment notice, as well as the completed re-entry permit or refugee travel document, if approved. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
See In re Hotels.com, 87 USPQ2d 1100 (TTAB 2008). [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
It's a communication about the referred site.Nor does such a link constitute a "making available [...] of" whatever may be on the other site (unless, which is not what we're talking about here, the other site is password-protected and you need to go through some other site to gain access). [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 3:17 am
See In re The Biltmore Company, Serial No. [read post]
24 May 2021, 10:57 am
We’re excited to announce that we’re now accepting applications for a new position at both Lawfare and the Brookings Institution: a Lawfare senior editor and Brookings fellow who will take on recently departed Executive Editor Susan Hennessey’s portfolio focusing on cybersecurity issues! [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 9:23 pm
Per In re JPMorgan Chase & Co. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 4:16 pm
Per In re JPMorgan Chase & Co. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am
This means that the Government's application cannot satisfy the territorial limits of Rule 41(b)(1).In re Warrant, supra. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
If you’re not committed to progressive beliefs, you won’t get a job at UCLA. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
On the contrary, applicant’s musically-minded consumers seem well aware of the significance of term LP and are quick to transfer these associations to applicant’s digital content, just as the term album has migrated from 78 rpm records to LPs, to compact discs, and now to digital music. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:18 am
Source: In Re Discovery [read post]
