Search for: "In re J. C." Results 901 - 920 of 4,388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2020, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
For this example, we’re using Double-Declining Balance, so the rate of acceleration would be 2. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
(NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,I, DONALD J. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:16 am
Contents include:Articles Ruth Mason, The Transformation of International Tax Armin von Bogdandy & René Urueña, International Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin AmericaCurrent DevelopmentsJoris Larik, Brexit, the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement, and Global Treaty (Re-)Negotiations International DecisionsChristian J. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 2:46 pm by INFORRM
On Monday morning Mr Depp continued to give evidence, being re-examined by his counsel, David Sherborne. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
 With that in mind we arrived at a tentative answer: yes--but that "yes" requires a re conception of democratic practice in ways alien to liberal democracies that center notions of "representation" and "election" in the construction of their own democratic universe. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:58 am by Dennis Crouch
In re Thomas, Appeal No. 17-1149 (December 13, 2017) (Affirming rejection for Application No. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Rand J. did not require the presence of an evil or of evil effects in the Margarine Reference. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On 10 July 2020, the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Re Judicial Review, Fine Point Films [2020] NICA 35. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:02 am by Administrator
 Young, 2020 SCC 15 (38242) Chief Justice Wagner (and 7 colleagues) wrote as follows (paras. 1-2): “We have carefully read the reasons of our colleague Côté J. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 8:05 am
In re Steve Elster, Serial No. 87749230 (July 2, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
En effet, comment pourrait-on reprocher au juge de première instance d’avoir omis de considérer dans son analyse d’autres violations de la Charte canadienne (toutes hypothétiques) alors qu’elles ont déjà été tranchées ou autrement examinées? [read post]