Search for: "John Doe, II" Results 901 - 920 of 3,336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Wall II, special agent in charge of the SBI’s human trafficking unit. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by David Priess
This lack of clarity in the Constitution about what counts as timely consent for judicial confirmations, however, does not extend to impeachment. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
What confuses many students (as well as lawyers and sometimes even judges) is that the doctrine of exigent circumstances is more of a concept than an exception, and it does not lend itself to a precise definition. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Padover’s[ii] magnificent essays about those who helped make the American experiment so fascinating. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 5:52 pm by Mark Weidemaier
Indeed, after John Bolton’s departure, we wonder whether anyone is even focused on this question. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
… He spoke of court cases, even footnotes and opinions, his military service in World War II, ballgames he’d attended. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:47 pm by Michel Paradis
And while not going quite that far, John Yoo has already taken to the op-ed pages of the New York Times to argue that impeaching a president for abusing his foreign relations powers is a near impossibility, in no small part because of executive privilege. [read post]
Impeachment does not implicate federalism, and it is an inherently political process, as the Founders well understood. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
As John Bies’s primer on the subject notes, protecting the confidentiality of communications between presidents and their senior advisers serves to protect candor in presidential deliberations. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Susan Landau
During World War II, the U.S. had five years—the time from Hitler’s invasion of Poland until D-Day—to build up its war machine. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Does this kind of allegation give rise to a Section 1983 claim? [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elector (Baca) had voted for a presidential candidate (John Kasich) other than the candidate for whom the elector had pledged to vote (Hillary Clinton) before being picked as an elector—hence the term “faithless. [read post]