Search for: "John Doe 2"
Results 901 - 920
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
The government could argue that cases 2 and 3 are not testimonial under Doe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
The anonymous plaintiff, John Doe, brought an action under 42 USC § 1983, claiming that Pennsylvania's Registration of Sexual Offender's Act, 42 Pa. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm
Plaintiff porn company sued an unknown bittorrent user (identified as John Doe) alleging that defendant had downloaded and distributed more than 20 of plaintiff’s films. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:51 pm
What does this mean as a practical matter for everyone else? [read post]
Precedential No. 27: TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusal of #WILLPOWER - Hashtag Has No Trademark Significance
22 Aug 2018, 3:36 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:48 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:42 am
” The Board further noted that “[t]he fact that there is limited evidence of the use of the combined term ‘ice blind’ does not defeat the Section 2(e)(1) refusal,” nor does it render the term “ice blind” incongruous or distinctive. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:33 am
In doing so, I draw on The Microsoft Case: Antitrust, High Technology, and Consumer Welfare (Chicago 2007), which I wrote with John Lopatka of Penn State. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
[What does intent have to do with it? [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:20 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:54 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:11 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:27 am
Compare the recent HERBAL ACCESS marijuana case.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
"Hang down your head John Whealan. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:45 pm
This is from volume 2, addressed to Barack Obama: NOW, LET'S DEAL WITH ABORTION. 40 MILLION ABORTIONS SINCE ROE V. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
While more accurate than John Simpson's earlier inaccurate ramblings on the re-examof the WARF patents, IPBiz adds some text. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
It's a misdemeanor possession charge which does not even subject someone to time in prison. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:39 am
It is black letter law that even if Applicant is the first and/or only user of the term, that does not mean the term is not descriptive of the goods and services.The Board therefore affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
