Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 901 - 920
of 7,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
Code §1546(b)(3). [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
That decision upheld the trial court's dismissal of the case against Harris Associates, a mutual fund advisor, on the ground that as long as a mutual fund adviser does not breach the fiduciary duty owed to shareholders by failing to disclose all pertinent facts or otherwise hindering the fund's directors from negotiating a favorable price, no judicial review of the reasonableness of the adviser's fee is required to dismiss a claim under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company… [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 8:41 am
In the accounting technology world, we were making the gargantuan leap from the VisiCalc spreadsheet and WordStar word processing software to Lotus 1-2-3 and WordPerfect. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:35 am
John G. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
To win the motion for summary judgment, John Hancock had to prove: 1) the making of a representation; 2) the falsity of the representation; 3) reliance on the misrepresentation by the insurer; 4) the intent to deceive on the part of the insured in making the misrepresentation; and 5) the materiality of the misrepresentation. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:26 am
The Lawyers also raise the following issues: 1) whether the "substantial adverse interest exception" protects the Carlsons from adverse tax consequences; 2) whether the Carlsons have brought this suit too early, as the IRS has not yet assigned a tax penalty; and 3) whether the trial court improperly considered the opinion of an attorney hired by the Carlsons. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
Nicholas Mignanelli (Yale University)The Lost Swedish-Language Minnesota Practice Rules of John B. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm
In light of this precedent, the enactment of a Federal law is the best way to ensure that claims to Nazi-confiscated art are adjudicated on their merits.3.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are the following:(1)To ensure that laws governing claims to Nazi-confiscated art further United States policy as set forth in the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, and the Terezin Declaration.(2)To ensure that claims to artwork… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm
In light of this precedent, the enactment of a Federal law is the best way to ensure that claims to Nazi-confiscated art are adjudicated on their merits.3.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are the following:(1)To ensure that laws governing claims to Nazi-confiscated art further United States policy as set forth in the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, and the Terezin Declaration.(2)To ensure that claims to artwork… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm
In light of this precedent, the enactment of a Federal law is the best way to ensure that claims to Nazi-confiscated art are adjudicated on their merits.3.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are the following:(1)To ensure that laws governing claims to Nazi-confiscated art further United States policy as set forth in the Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the Holocaust Victims Redress Act, and the Terezin Declaration.(2)To ensure that claims to artwork… [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 3:21 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:02 pm
Part 2, focused on growers, will appear tomorrow.) [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:36 am
The plaintiffs argued that John Hancock’s conduct satisfied items (1) and (2) above. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
John’s on June 3, 1996; Dominica, signed at Roseau on October 10, 1996; Grenada, signed at St. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
While, unlike the OVDP, a “quiet disclosure” does not “guarantee” a taxpayer of no criminal prosecution, the practical result and the experience of practitioners who have assisted clients who have made quiet disclosures is that there is a very small likelihood of a criminal prosecution for two principal reasons: (1) Voluntary compliance results and is generally encouraged in our tax system, and (2) there is little to no… [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:13 am
In re Canine Caviar Pet Foods, Inc., Serial No. 85710350 (May 17, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie).Deceptiveness under Section 2(a) requires a showing that (1) the mark misdescribes the goods, (2) consumers would likely believe the misdescription, and (3) the misrepresentation would materially affect the purchasing decision. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:44 pm
Federal District Court Judge, John F. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:44 pm
Federal District Court Judge, John F. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
The announcement and privacy blueprint envisions a comprehensive and integrated framework for data protection, rather than the current sector-patchwork-quilt approach, and is comprised of four key pillars: (1) a consumer privacy bill of rights; (2) a multi-stakeholder process and approach dealing with how such a bill of rights would apply in a business context; (3) more effective enforcement; and (4) greater commitment to harmonization and cooperation in the international… [read post]
