Search for: "Johnson v. State " Results 901 - 920 of 8,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Corizon, Inc., 949 F.3d 489, 506 (9th Cir. 2020) (Bumatay, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) (same); United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 11:57 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Their Complaint was originally filed in Illinois State court against Mead Johnson Nutrition Company. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 11:57 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Their Complaint was originally filed in Illinois State court against Mead Johnson Nutrition Company. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:25 am by Robert S. Gilmore
Van Tatenhove of the Eastern District of Kentucky granted a preliminary injunction preventing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors from taking effect in the three states, which had challenged the mandate earlier this month in Commonwealth of Kentucky et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's another such case (which I think expresses what today would be the minority view), from 1913 Arkansas, Moore v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 7:19 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
On 15 November 2021 judgment in Mueen-Udin v Secretary of State for the Home Department was handed down by Nicol J. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]