Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr" Results 901 - 920 of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has this post on the Court's decision in Los Angeles County v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
Berkeley School of Law, everyone can now find some of the amicus briefs filed today in Baze v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:41 pm
Orin Kerr comments on Tom's post, "A True Rightward Turn? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court issued its decision in the GPS tracking case United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 12:33 pm by Eric Lipman
Apparently, the citations that should link to the Supreme Court's decision in Virginia v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:19 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The US Solicitor General has petitioned for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 12:15 pm
At Workplace Prof Blog, Paul Secunda highlights how last term's ruling in Garcetti v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
The word knowledge implies an awareness derived from ‘objectively verifiable facts’ (per Lord Kerr at para 209), and a mere belief or suspicion unsupported by evidence ought not to be sufficient in this regard. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
The word knowledge implies an awareness derived from ‘objectively verifiable facts’ (per Lord Kerr at para 209), and a mere belief or suspicion unsupported by evidence ought not to be sufficient in this regard. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Kerr and Lady Black consider that the duty to act fairly in the circumstances involves a “duty not to deprive, not an obligation to create”. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:26 am by Kali Borkoski
United States, and Ryburn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:02 pm by Kyle Graham
Orin Kerr has posted an analysis of the case over on SCOTUSblog; I have little to add to his thoughtful commentary. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:47 am
" As emerging technologies upend societal expectations of privacy, some legal experts point to People v. [read post]