Search for: "King v. People" Results 901 - 920 of 2,504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The night before the battle of Agincourt, Henry V ponders that, “all [of the King’s] senses have but human conditions: his ceremonies laid by, in his nakedness he appears but a man; and though his affections are higher mounted than ours, yet, when they stoop, they stoop with the like wing. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:10 am by SHG
And indeed, the New York Court of Appeals has approved their use, per People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
The New South Wales government has called for national laws to allow people to sue for damages for serious invasions of privacy, as it pursues separate state-based reforms to criminalise revenge porn. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Pascarella v Goldberg, Cohn & Richter, LLP ; 2009 NY Slip Op 52193(U) ; ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Hinds-Radix, J. we see how the court works its way through plaintiff's claims. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
  In Pascarella v Goldberg, Cohn & Richter, LLP ; 2009 NY Slip Op 52193(U) ;Decided on October 23, 2009 ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Hinds-Radix, J. we see how the court works its way through plaintiff's claims. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:14 pm by Tom Smith
" While it's fairly disturbing that the Clinton team would flippantly admit such things, what's even worse is that they plotted to use Obama's same strategy of applying political pressure on the Supreme Court in 2015 to overturn "King v Burwell" which also threatened Obamacare's future. [read post]