Search for: "LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS" Results 901 - 920 of 1,309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Thomas Lee
Cas. 810 (D.S.C. 1795), who had captured a British merchantman as prize and sailed her into Charleston harbor as against the alien cargo owners (and his possibly American agent, Darrel), who had seized the cargo (of slaves) after landfall in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm by David Kopel
United States, 164 U.S. 493, 502 (1896), involved a victim who was on someone else’s property; there, the Court upheld a jury instruction in favor of a duty to retreat. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
  While the media has consistently portrayed this case as a battle between property owners as David against the EPA’s Goliath, the opinion also represents a victory for all property owners, including businesses and corporations. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
  While the media has consistently portrayed this case as a battle between property owners as David against the EPA’s Goliath, the opinion also represents a victory for all property owners, including businesses and corporations. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by William Funk
 The case involved the Sacketts, owners of some property near Priest Lake in Idaho, upon which they wished to build a house. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm by Chuck Maduell
. ___(2012)  (No. 10-1062, March 21, 2012) (Ginsberg, J. and Alito, J, concurring), held that the Sacketts, owners of a 2/3-acre residential lot near Priest Lake in Idaho, could bring a civil action under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) challenging an EPA compliance order under Section 309 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:59 am by Chuck Maduell
. ___(2012) (No. 10-1062, March 21, 2012) (Ginsberg, J. and Alito, J, concurring), held that the Sacketts, owners of a 2/3-acre residential lot near Priest Lake in Idaho, could bring a civil action under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) challenging an EPA compliance order under Section 309 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:53 pm
At least, property owners like petitioners will have the right to challenge the EPA's jurisdictional determination under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:13 pm by Richard Frank
As expected following an especially lively set of oral arguments in the Sackett case earlier this year, the justices ruled–unanimously–in favor of the private property owners who had brought this litigation under the wetlands provisions of the Clean Water Act, and against EPA. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Mark Alpert
”   If EPA believe someone has developed property that includes a wetland, they have authority to order that property owner to restore the property and levy sanctions of over $35,000 a day. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by Lyle Denniston
The decision, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, opens the federal courthouse door to an Idaho couple who have a .63-acre parcel of property close to Priest Lake, and plan to build a house on it. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:21 pm by Law Lady
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellee. 4th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Deficiency -- Trial court abused discretion by rejecting expert testimony of property appraiser as to fair market value of property and denying mortgagee's motion for deficiency judgmentBEACH COMMUNITY BANK, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Subsequently, on October 23, 2007, the Hirschhorns filed with Auto-Owners a notice of property loss. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Subsequently, on October 23, 2007, the Hirschhorns filed with Auto-Owners a notice of property loss. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:19 am by Alan Ackerman
“We at the city want to keep good working relations with the owner and property developer,” the mayor said. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:05 am by Alan Ackerman
It may not be so important to know what type of pollution is on the actual site, which is essentially forbidden in the deed restrictions on the property, but to find out if any of the alleged pollution is leaking into Muskegon Lake, which is public asset. [read post]