Search for: "LAWS v. FISHER"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 12:54 am
Fisher, ––– U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
As counsel for Velocys accepted, Velocys would not be able to make such amendments in the context of EPO opposition proceedings by virtue of Rule 80 of the EPC Implementing Regulations: see T 993/07 Fisher-Rosemount/Field device management system(unreported, 20 May 2010) cited in Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (7th edition) at p. 899. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
* In Cold Comfort Farmers Cards: Californians feel New Zealand chill, Katfriend Ken Moon (AJPark) writes about ruling of the New Zealand Court of Appeal in a software copyright and trade secrets dispute, Karum Group LLC v Fisher & Paykel Finance [2014] NZCA 389. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:57 am
"Much depends on Dura’s credibility," the court said, stating it was possible a jury could see Dura’s explanation as a pretext, or find that the drug test had targeted information about employees' physical or mental health, regardless of Dura’s stated intent.But it was not a matter of law that Dura violated the ADA.The case is Bates et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:42 am
Case NoteJames Maurici & Alistair Mills, Regina (Buckinghamshire County Council and others) v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
While this was trite law it was reinforced by the TRIPS Agreement, to which New Zealand had been a signatory since 1994. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 6:47 am
Holder to Fisher v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:36 am
Holder to Fisher v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 8:48 am
Holder to Fisher v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
Holder to Fisher v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:59 am
See Fisher v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
Y por eso, Bradley demandó al juez Fisher por daños y perjuicios.Esto es: los jueces no pueden ser demandados civilmente por las consecuencias de sus fallos incluso aunque hayan actuado con dolo o malicia.El caso, Bradley v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 8:18 am
Holder to Fisher v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:56 pm
Last year we wrote about a decision of the Indiana Court of Appeals, Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
” Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Fisher’s lawyers had taken her constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that the university had not justified the race-conscious part of its admissions plan that it adopted in the wake of the 2003 decision by the Justices in a University of Michigan Law School case (Grutter v. [read post]
