Search for: "LAWS v. ROGERS" Results 901 - 920 of 4,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
H/T to Alison Frankel for the pointer to the oral arguments in Linde v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:13 am by Venkat
(See "SEO/Web Design Consultant Faces Contributory Trademark Liability for "Copycat" E-Commerce Site--Roger Cleveland Golf v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm by Michael Geist
V is for Voltage Pictures, which won a court order to obtain information on thousands of alleged file sharers. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-10-18 http://t.co/fLXIX1Pwvp -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-10-18: Cyberbullying bill inches closer to law despite priva… http://t.co/Jt8xEVdzzh -> Cambridge, Oxford, Sage v GSU Appeals court overturns finding of fair use http://t.co/QF45fOhUbQ -> Negative online reviews can lead to threats of legal action from targeted businesses http://t.co/HtNAiZqizF -> How… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:32 am
Neither is it like the probation revocation proceeding in Rogers, because father does not face incarceration or similar criminal law sanctions as a result of this proceeding. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Yesterday the University at Buffalo Law School held the panel discussion “Sex, Solicitation, and the Supreme Court: Remembering People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Canada On 19 June 2024, the Court of Appeal for Ontario handed down judgement in the case of Athanassiades v Rogers Communications Canada Inc., 2024 ONCA 497. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am by Frank Ravitch
Stowers Chair in Law & Religion Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
The Rogers test had been applied in cases when the appropriation of a celebrity likeness created a false and misleading impression that the celebrity was endorsing a product.As explained in Seale v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/9jDhrh5Fra -> Bell must justify Astral takeover, CRTC says http://t.co/cSpwqtFg6K -> Anton Pillar orders reviewed in XY, LLC v. [read post]