Search for: "Land v. People"
Results 901 - 920
of 4,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Now, the bloggers’ responses to the report: ObiterJ has posted a very informative initial reaction, which covers Lord Justice Leveson’s main points upon the publication of his report – a free press is a vital safeguard in a democracy (and as such, the government should not be involved in press regulation), there was no evidence of widespread corruption at the top level of police/media relations (though politicians did get too close to media elements), and Ministers were the right… [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 3:03 pm
The Third District Appellate Court of California's Court of Appeals has just issued People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:21 am
Atonio (2014) The Vietnamese Fishermen and The Ku Klux Klan (2015) This Land is Our Land: Oyama v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
I bring you two important cases from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) about sub-let fees and administration charges:Holding & Management (Solitaire Ltd) v Norton and other appeals [2012] UKUT 1 and Re: Bradmoss Ltd [2012] UKUT 3 (LC). [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm
Wasden, landed in the 9th U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
I bring you two important cases from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) about sub-let fees and administration charges:Holding & Management (Solitaire Ltd) v Norton and other appeals [2012] UKUT 1 and Re: Bradmoss Ltd [2012] UKUT 3 (LC). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am
Any interpretation of Shari’a that requires breaking the ‘law of the land. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:22 pm
Federal law says that you're allowed to prosecute these actions in the place where the plane landed; here, in the Central District of California.Is that consistent with the Constitution? [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
[Post by Venkat] Crispin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 7:57 pm
"Nollan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am
Texas already releases 72,000 people per year, so most folks in TDCJ are going to get out. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
Bank v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 2:35 pm
Related Web Resources: Papadopoulos v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:24 am
Anyway, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Holt v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
Here, the false statement is about land, not people, but it still results in real harm to the plaintiff who is allowed to seek legal redress from the defendant upon sufficient proof of the cause of action. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
It's time for marriage equality to be the law of the land and we at the ACLU plan to make that a reality. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
From Weaver v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
In parallel with her story, the audience follows the legal efforts of Sarah’s ancestor, John Ridge, in the 1830s to defend the sovereignty of his people to uphold their laws and Constitution. [read post]
