Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 88,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The best statement of the rule is that a wrong-doer is responsible for the natural and proximate consequences of his [or her] misconduct' " (Battalla v State of New York, 10 NY2d 237, 240; see Derby v Prewitt, 12 NY2d 100, 105-106). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:50 am by Lawrence Solum
Pomeroy (Pacific Legal Foundation - Program for Judicial Awareness and Pacific Legal Foundation) have posted Desperately Seeking Scrutiny: Why the Supreme Court Should Use Fisher v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am by Bill Amadeo
In what looked like an impossible hurdle to climb, the law firm of Grabel and Associates shocked the state of Michigan by winning their second decision before the Michigan Supreme Court in less than a 3-week time span when the highest court of the state overturned the “People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 4:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
While recently researching a Florida legal matter, I came upon this Utah Supreme Court case — Hill v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  However in Legal Malpractice, there will be extensive review of actual v. ascertainable damages. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 2:04 pm by Apple Payne Law PLLC
This post examines the legal reasoning and practical results of Dobbs. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Morris, 2018 ONSC 5186 “Mr. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 12:05 pm
"House rejects abortion measure; Cost of state-led legal battle over Roe cited": The Deseret Morning News today contains an article that begins, "The Utah House on Monday voted against funding a multimillion-dollar fight against Roe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As Hoffer details Hamilton's arguments for the supremacy of treaty law over state law, the significance of Rutgers v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]