Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 21,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:28 pm by Elizabeth A. Patton
This morning, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated ruling in the Lee v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
In some of the years in question, none of the children were citizens of the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am by Kristin E. Hickman
United States and his concurring opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Patrick E. Knie
Agape Senior Primary Care, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was asked to review a case arising in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia that presented a more unique issue. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:08 am by fraudfighters
  The two cases that initiated the investigation, United States and New York State ex rel. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
United States are taught to every first-year law student. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Despite being published as a final rule, this positive step toward what is properly “navigable waters of the United States” is back to the future, but a long way from being final. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:48 pm by Skylar Hunter
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, September 24 – Today, Renne Public Law Group (RPLG), a San Francisco-based law firm that represents local governments, filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief asking the United States Supreme Court to review City of Boise v. [read post]
5 May 2006, 7:32 am
The United States Supreme Court, in a 9-0 opinion written by Justice Ginsburg, decided the scope and applicability of the probate exception to federal jurisdiction. [read post]