Search for: "Lord v. Lord" Results 901 - 920 of 5,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  Exemplary damages for libel were upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Hill v Church of Scientology ([1995] 2 SCR 1130). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am by Ciaran Gill, Olswang LLP
Quoting Benedetti v Sawiris [2013] UKSC 50, Lord Clarke held that the court must ask itself four questions when faced with a claim for unjust enrichment: “(1) Has the defendant been enriched? [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson on 12 April 2016. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Therefore, my attention was grabbed by the opinion of Lord Glennie sitting in the Outer House of the Court of Session in The Tartan Army Limited v Sett Gmbh, Oliver Reifler, Iain Emerson and Alba Football Fans Limited [2015] CSOH141, a trade mark infringement case. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Last week, the Lords Constitution Committee heard evidence on the impact of Brexit on the courts from the President and Deputy President of the Supreme Court, in which Baroness Hale warned that judges could be forced into making what appear to be “political decisions” under the Government’s Brexit bill. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The High Court and the Court of Appeal declined to set aside the consent order on the basis that Mr Sharland would not have made a substantially different order in the financial proceedings, applying the decision of the House of Lords in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v Jenkins [1985] AC 424. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 20 May 2021 the BBC published a Report  by former Master of the Rolls and Supreme Court Justice, Lord Dyson into the circumstances of how BBC reporter Martin Bashir came to interview Princess Diana for the BBC Panorama in November 1995. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:37 pm
" So said Lord Justice Wall, introducing his judgment in Kernott v Jones [2010] EWCA Civ 578.The Facts: The parties were an unmarried couple who purchased a property together in 1985. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
By Judgment handed down on 29 November 2018 (R (on the Application of Jefferies and Others) v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin)) Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the Claimants claims for Judicial Review of the Government’s decision to not embark on ‘Part 2’ of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am by Chris Stott, Pannone LLP
On 5th May, a seven Justice Supreme Court, comprising Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and, reflecting, coincidentally, the changes confirmed earlier this week, Lord Collins (who will shortly retire) and Lord Justice Wilson (who, on this occasion will sit as an acting Justice but who will be sworn in as a full time Justice on 26th May), will consider this issue in the case of R v Waya [2010] EWCA Crim 412. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
[Update]  On Friday 4 November 2011, the Administrative Court (Elias LJ and King J) will hear an application for permission in the judicial review case of R (Decoulos) v Lord Justice Leveson. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am by CMS
You can also read the essays of the runners-up here. 2023 Winning Essay byAlexis Boddy In a judgment by the House of Lords in 2003, Lord Hoffman discussed the importance of individual human rights in democratic societies. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
 As the Court of Appeal judgement delivered by Lord Justice Floyd (Lord Justice Elias and Lord Justice Kitchin concurring) memorably observed:Genentech now recognises, however, that there is no realistic prospect of this court re-visiting the judge's conclusion that a dosing regimen of 8 + 7.14 q3w was obvious. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Returning to Khuja, the majority took the view that A v BBC turned on very particular facts and did not represent a departure from the approach taken in Re S  and Re Guardian News and Media, which was endorsed in A v BBC [28]. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 5:10 am by Frank Cranmer
Religious male circumcision On 6 February, Lord Scriven (Lib Dem) tabled the question: “To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the case of R v Mohammad Siddiqui [2025], in particular the remarks of HHJ Lucas KC that ‘safeguards and protections must now be put in place and put in place as a matter of urgency, to ensure that babies and young children are protected from ritual circumcision’. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  Details of the mechanism of the alleged fraud can be found in the Opinions of Lord Tyre, [2015] CSOH 150, and Lord Doherty, [2016] CSOH 107. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
It is well established that this “view” can exist both before and after publication (Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:09 am
(Lord knows, we can use all the help we can get.)So we welcome aboard our new visitors who came through this link from Russell Jackson's Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts blog.We're also delighted to be spared the effort of writing up Williams v. [read post]