Search for: "MANN v. STATE"
Results 901 - 920
of 936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
In NLRB v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Case citation: Milo & Gabby, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:24 pm
And pretty closely related to Thomas Ruffin's State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:57 pm
Freis v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:24 pm
Adopting the Illinois Supreme Court's reasoning in 2314 Lincoln Park West Condominium Association v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
There’s also a useful “tl;dr” explainer by Sam Bowman and Geoff Manne (here). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Most recently, Orenstein and Mann wrote: “The two of us have each been immersed in Washington politics and policymaking for more than 43 years—and we have never seen [a Congress] this dysfunctional. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
Circuit’s subsequent decision in Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Porro v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
” A recent, interesting discussion on X (the platform formerly known as Twitter), involving Geoff Manne, Herb Hovenkamp, Steve Salop, and others illustrated some of the complexity in implementation. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 9:56 pm
" After Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:56 am
While put rights generally are a strong exit mechanism, GMX Technologies v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:16 pm
SP Technologies v. [read post]
