Search for: "MARCH v. PETER"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
In July 2009, real parties Peter Plotkin et al., filed a suit against the City for inverse condemnation and damages due to condemnation blight. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
bit.ly/yNE968 (Robert Hilson) Improving Collaboration Between Inside and Outside Counsel in E-Discovery - bit.ly/yMgmik (@eDiscoveryBeat) In Civil Litigation, 'Private' Social Media Data Isn't Private - bit.ly/zN4TEq (Aaron Crews) In 'U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
Elsegood v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
A judgment delivered on March 17, 2009, by Deputy High Judge Chen Jiangyao (???) [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:23 am
Check out Barusch’s most-recent Dealpolitik column (linked above), and some related materials: Martin Marietta Materials’ S-4 launching the takeover attempt (Skadden’s Peter Allan Atkins, Eric L. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
bit.ly/wVssl2 (Jim Eidelman) Privilege Or Work Product Waivers - bit.ly/xENsqj (Federal Evidence Review) Resolution on 'Pippins' Discovery Nears, Though Debate Continues - bit.ly/zTrmUQ (Evan Koblentz) Review Website Ordered to Close after Defaming and Harassing Lawyers - bit.ly/tV21Ex (Pinsent Masons) Singapore eDiscovery Case Update: Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223 - bit.ly/AcLYYc (Serena Lim) Social Media Gotchas in Court - bit.ly/AlNxmG (Eric… [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Inforrm published a list of anonymised privacy injunctions from January to March 2011. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 11:50 pm
R v Peter and Frances Kavanagh – Salford Magistrates Court This is another failure to comply with selective licensing. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
Americo Life, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
Americo Life, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:43 pm
Ashford Gear LLC)] Tags: class actions, Florida, Los Angeles, obesity, patent litigation, patent trolls, police, public employment, tobacco Related posts March 15 roundup (1) July 8 roundup (5) Fit for a foot chase? [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Carnwath LJ approved Peter Smith J's statement at [17] of Hanoman v Southwark that: The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or denying the right to buy. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Carnwath LJ approved Peter Smith J's statement at [17] of Hanoman v Southwark that: The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or denying the right to buy. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Peter K. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
IV avers as follows: The complaint goes on to state that I can’t help but think that these are the points that IV founder Peter Detkin should have made when he was featured in NPR’s This American Life’s episode entitled When Patents Attack. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm
The recent Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:30 am
Her parents, Peter Dalsgaard and Denise Montoya, were divorcing, in Denmark. [read post]
