Search for: "MARRIAGE OF A R C" Results 901 - 920 of 1,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2015, 7:50 am by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
This privilege arose from the strong public policy of encouraging free and uninhibited communications between spouses, and consequently, of protecting the sanctity and tranquility of marriage, and was viewed as essential to the preservation of the marriage relationship. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
However, you may apply for a waiver of this joint filing requirement if: (a) you entered the marriage in good faith, but your spouse subsequently died; (b) you entered the marriage in good faith, but the marriage was later terminated due to divorce or annulment; (c) you entered the marriage in good faith and have remained married, but you have been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by your U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse; or (d) the… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:30 am by Lindsay A. Heller
The husband’s lack of credibility resulted in a unique comment of the Appellate Division when it stated that the trial court’s counsel fee opinion was upheld even though the trial court did not specify the factors considered under the applicable Court Rule, R. 5:3-5(c). [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Russell Knight
R. 323(c) An interested party cannot provide a record of their own version of events. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
C v C (Ancillary Relief: Nuptial Settlement) [2004] EWCA Civ 1030, [2005] Fam 250, at para 31. 104. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 4:04 am by Russell Knight
R. 907(c) The child representative can file motions, issue discovery requests and do whatever else a lawyer representing a client can do. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm by Eliana Baer
In Rothfeld, the parties divorced after an approximately seven (7) year marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
” The respondent’s status was adjusted to that of a lawfulpermanent resident in September 2004, based on her marriage to a naturalizedUnited States citizen. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
(c)          What were their feelings toward each other? [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Senators and commentators have long debated whether ideology is a legitimate criterion for voting against the confirmation of a professionally qualified nominee, with no consensus emerging.On one hand, presidents very clearly consider ideology in choosing whom to nominate, thereby suggesting that Senators in choosing whether to “consent” to a nomination should likewise be able to make their judgments on that ground.On the other hand, given polarization on the most consequential issues… [read post]