Search for: "MATTER OF V R B" Results 901 - 920 of 8,794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
R (Joseph) v LB Newham [2008] EWHC 1637 (Admin) Blanket policies are unlawful. [read post]
2 May 2019, 2:22 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
The court refused leave to appeal under section 167(3)(b)(ii) of the Constitution because of the lack of general public importance. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
And he explained Tansey v Gill as a case in which the judge was fully satisfied that the defendant could have no defence to the proceedings, thereby fulfilling the terms section 33(1)(b). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:19 am by J
Malik v LB Tower Hamlets [2010] EWHC 2921 (Admin) And so, another council tax/HMO appeal finds its way to the High Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:36 am by INFORRM
 However, neither Google Sites nor Mr Yıldırım’s site were the subject of court proceedings. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Next question: does it matter which Board of Appeal hears your case when it comes to the distinctiveness inquiry under Article 7(1)(b)? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am by NL
Ravichandran & Anor v London Borough of Lewisham [2010] EWCA Civ 755 Or Omar v Birmingham City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 610 revisted. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am by NL
Ravichandran & Anor v London Borough of Lewisham [2010] EWCA Civ 755 Or Omar v Birmingham City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 610 revisted. [read post]