Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 901 - 920
of 120,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 8:35 am
In the case New York v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:19 pm
Virginia to prohibit the use of current medical standards on intellectual disability, and require the use of outdated medical standards, in determining whether an individual may be executed; and (2) whether execution of a condemned individual more than three-and-one-half decades after the imposition of a death sentence violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
In Sims v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:22 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Morgan v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:22 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Morgan v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:22 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Morgan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:59 am
Here is the abstract: In his Dunwoody Lecture, Professor Akhil Amar invites us to revisit the Bush v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:54 am
EPA, No. 20-cv-03714 (S.D.N.Y May 13, 2020), and Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:44 pm
Since the US Supreme Court’s 2021 Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 4:55 am
One of the first indications of this new direction came in the Eisai Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
On 17 May 2019 Julian Knowles J heard an appeal in the case of Desporte v Bull. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
Supreme Court heard an argument in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
Supreme Court heard an argument in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:16 am
In the recent domain name dispute of Pidela Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:18 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
Relying primarily on Kim v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 12:03 am
In other words, the world may need Missouri v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 6:28 am
Once again, thanks to Tony Green of The Oregonian, for alerting us to this:In Andersen v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
Applying Hellewell v Chief Constable of Derbyshire [1995] 1 WLR 804 at 810F the Court considered that such use was reasonable. [read post]
19 May 2019, 6:03 am
“The Abortion Fight and the Pretense of Precedent: State legislators have proposed Draconian new laws on the assumption that, when they come before the Supreme Court, they will be used to vanquish Roe v. [read post]
