Search for: "Marcia More" Results 901 - 920 of 1,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2010, 7:30 am by Amanda Rice
In another post for the National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle discusses both the Chemerinsky/Starr brief and, more broadly, the four preemption cases at the Court this Term. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
The feds gave the drug makers three more years to market the stronger drug exclusively. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 4:39 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The court added: “Requiring Does to use a decryption password is most certainly more akin to requiring the production of a combination because both demand the use of the contents of the mind, and the production is accompanied by the implied factual statements noted above that could prove to be incriminatory. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
More coverage relating to Monday’s ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:43 am
Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal is a regular NewsHour Supreme Court analyst. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:25 pm
Challenger Marcia CaballeroCircuit Court Group 55Incumbent Jeri Beth Cohen vs. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
University of Texas at Austin at more length on Economix, also via The New York Times. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Law.com, Marcia Coyle reports that a “committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States has been asked to review orders dismissing misconduct complaints against now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh that stem from his 2017 U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:21 am
Judy Woodruff is anchoring live coverage of the Kagan hearings from Capitol Hill, featuring the analysis of the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle, Watch it live on your local PBS station or right here at the Online NewsHour. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At Law360 (subscription required), Michael Macagnone reports that “[t]he small number of Senate Democrats planning to meet with … Kavanaugh grew slightly larger this week as several more lawmakers from the minority party said they will sit down with the would-be justice. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In Hyland, now-retired Circuit Court Judge Marcia Maras ruled in May 2022 that the act was unconstitutional because it violated various federal and state constitutional provisions, including the provision about “special legislation” under the Illinois Constitution. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
”  And in the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Marcia Coyle reports that, although “[n]one of the same sex marriage cases the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
” In Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Marcia Coyle reports on studies of cases in “relist limbo” – that is, cases relisted by the Justices multiple times. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle covered the Cline order for this blog; other coverage comes from Marcia Coyle at the Blog of Legal Times, Peter Snyder at JURIST, William Mears of CNN, and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Brooke Singman at Fox News, Elizabeth Lowman at Jurist, Marcia Coyle at Law.com, and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, who reports that the “[w]hile Planned Parenthood said it would immediately notify patients that it can no longer offer the procedure in the state, the case is expected to… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
Fields “makes it more likely that the police will now try to define custody in a way that circumvents the spirit and principle of the Miranda rule. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:51 am by Leslie Pardo
  If you want a more neutral take, please refer to our Legal Citation  research guide. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 6:02 am by Melissa Healy and Carolyn Walker
*Give additional options to employers that claim undue hardship and require employees to take leave in more than one-hour increments. [read post]