Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2023, 1:03 pm
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now nearly three years old, has published 65 articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), Keith Whittington (Princeton, moving to Yale) (forthcoming), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:01 pm
See Cotropia, Christopher Anthony, Lemley, Mark A. and Sampat, Bhaven N., Do Applicant Patent Citations Matter? [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from professors Mark A. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 5:45 am
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now nearly four years old, has published 65 articles, including by Robert Post (Yale), Jack Balkin (Yale), Keith Whittington (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Geoffrey Stone (Chicago), Vince Blasi (Columbia), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have… [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 1:38 pm
"England at that time finally shook off this ancient loadstone and was then in a position to start to become one of the world's leading powers, unencumbered by "sovereign immunities".The idea that any State is somehow "above the law" or "'immune from the Rule of Law" in any manner is a rustic notion propagated in our day by dark age nostalgia and historically uninformed judges and Supreme Court Justices, some of whom seem to have lost sight of what the… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 4:01 pm
Lemley's beliefe that "power corrupts and PowerPoint corrupts absolutely. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
Contar obvias mentiras sobre sus antecedentes, gritar a los senadores, negarse a responder preguntas y culpar de sus problemas a otros no es un comportamiento apropiado”, dijo Mark Lemley, profesor de la Escuela de Derecho de Stanford. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:29 pm
Burk & Mark A. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 9:03 pm
"); Mark A. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:19 am
In particular, as I urged in an amicus brief with Professors Mark Lemley, Michael Risch, and Polk Wagner—Bilski rightly adheres to the 150-year old tradition that as long as the claimed invention is a machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or a process, only natural phenomena, laws of nature, and abstract ideas should be excluded from eligible subject matter. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:10 am
Allison & Mark A. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now two years old, has published over fifty articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming within a week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 6:46 am
I'm no cyberlawyer, but the plaintiffs in this case are represented by one of the best -- Mark Lemley, of Stanford Law School. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 8:26 am
This brief substantially follows Mark Lemley’s article on the topic. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
" with Mark Lemley. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:58 pm
The waste in resources imposed by such exercises is clear evidence that the "rational ignorance" approach of Mark Lemley should be repudiated. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:40 am
Separately at the annual meeting, I also spoke on a panel with Mark Lemley and Dan Burk on the functionality doctrine, especially as applied to Rosetta Stone. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:09 pm
The fear of free-riding, as Mark Lemley has ably described, is now everywhere. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:48 am
Sort of like Mark Lemley of Stanford writing a law review article in the Texas law review favorable to the IT/Cisco viewpoint on damages AND for which the research for the article was paid for by Cisco and Microsoft and other IT folks. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:08 pm
. ______ Mark A. [read post]
