Search for: "Mark Connot" Results 901 - 920 of 1,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 1:45 pm by Intelligent Challenge
Of course for fellow lawyers in private practice, and for in-house lawyers, the title and connotations will be understood. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:03 pm
ThyssenKrupp's reading of TriMed misses the mark. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm by Zoe Tillman
“The marks conjure up the same connotation and create the same overall commercial impression," the NBCC argued in its complaint. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:22 am by John L. Welch
It found the marks to be more dissimilar than similar in appearance, more similar than dissimilar in sound, similar in connotation, and more similar in commercial impression than dissimilar. [read post]
15 May 2011, 1:56 pm by J DeVoy
 Every brand has negative connotations; Chevrolet is associated with poor quality and a [...] [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:12 am by John L. Welch
" The mark is not merely descriptive of wines.Since the PTO failed to establish that consumers would view AMERICAN HERITAGE as describing a significant ingredient of wines, "no matter what grapes are contained in applicant's wine the examining attorney cannot prevail on the Section 2(a) alternative ground of refusal.And so the Board reversed both refusals.TTABlog comment: I don't have any quarrels with this one, do you? [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:26 am by John L. Welch
Opposer's mark connotes goods possessing simple-construction or an easy-to-use quality; applicant's mark shares the same connotation with the additional connotation that the goods 'make sense' or are practical in nature.Finally, the Board rejected Applicant's suggestion that SENSE AND SIMPLICITY is "a unitary mark that creates a strong and distinctive commercial impression. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:05 am by John L. Welch
Let's see how you weather this TTAB storm: Fast Forward opposed Houdini's application to register the mark CLOUDBANKS for wine, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark FOGBANK for wine. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by WSLL
Regardless of whether forklifts are mentioned in the Agricultural Engineers standards, Appellant’s argument misses the mark. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:14 am by John L. Welch
There is no evidence that MOCCA would be understood as having a different connotation from “mocha. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:41 am by John L. Welch
The Board therefore found that the marks "differ in appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:21 am by John L. Welch
Therefore, the Board concluded that ROOTER is "an arbitrary and strong term" in connection with the involved services.And so, despite the differences in the marks, the Board found them to be "similar in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression," and it sustained the opposition.TTABlog comment: I think MAN is the dominant word in Opposer's mark. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:08 am by John L. Welch
"As regards connotation, since both parties’ goods include edible pet treats, the term “strips” would mean the same thing in relation to both marks. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:03 pm by John L. Welch
"[B]ecause “Hofbrauhaus” is not part of the cited marks, and because the only element of the registrant’s marks that can be articulated is “HB,” which is identical to applicant’s mark HB, we find that the marks are identical in pronunciationSimilarly, as to meaning, Applicant's mark would connote only the meaning "HB. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Initial conception of dilution was targeted at coined/fanciful marks, giving copyright-like interests some play—you can’t copy that famous unique mark. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:05 am by John L. Welch
" "Nonetheless, any possible difference in the connotations of the marks does not outweigh the overall similarity between them. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am by John L. Welch
March 28, 2011) [precedential].Citibank dropped its dilution claim on appeal, and instead focused on the two du Pont factors that the Board decided in CCB's favor: the dissimilarity of the marks and the lack of actual confusion.Similarity of the marks: The appellate court ruled that substantial evidence supported the Board's factual finding that the CAPITAL CITY BANK marks and the mark CITIBANK are "dissimilar in appearance, sound,… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:39 pm by Marty Schwimmer
In the context of applicant's services, in addition to other possible connotations, "APP" will be immediately recognized as an abbreviation of the applicant's well-known APPLE name and mark, and the mark as a whole, APP STORE, will be immediately recognized as a variant of the applicant's well-known APPLE STORE mark. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:58 pm by Jay McDaniel
IMPORTED FROM DETROIT fancifully and creatively combines inconsistent terms to connote this concept. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:52 am by John L. Welch
It is displayed prominently in the top portion of applicant's mark directly above the image of a cow, and it gives the same connotation and commercial impression as registrant's mark, both suggesting beef (or meat) from cattle that have been raised in the right manner. [read post]