Search for: "Mark Smith v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
As the court stated in McClain:[A]nother methodological problem undermines [the expert's] analogical approach. . . . [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
Smith on July 18, 2023. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Smith Docket: 10-1115 Issue: Did the Ninth Circuit exceed its authority under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
" Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
” Also last Thursday, in McCullen v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm
303 Creative v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This post is from the Reed Smith (and now we should add Cozen) side of the blog only, as Dechert is involved in the litigation to be discussed.You’ll have to forgive us – we’re weird that way – but we found the opinion in Carter v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
is not a trade mark says the CFI (IPKat) France Evian revamps its bottle with a little joywashing, teams up with designer Paul Smith (Class 99) Second HADOPI law faces constitutionality test by French Socialists (Intellectual Property Watch) Germany Good news for copyright infringers or a Trapp to Tripp designers? [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:54 pm
With this in mind, today in our discussion of FCC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
Rogers (D.D.C. 1972) (noting that the Supreme Court's Graham case "made clear" that "state laws restricting aliens' power to own land … was based on obsolete premises"); Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
He's crazy as a bedbug, and clearly was at the time of the killings and the time of the trial.None of those things mattered because the legal standards as they've developed (in part at the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:43 am
Gordon Smith, Glen L. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Thomas McCarthy's seminal treatise on trademark law states his "who are you, what are you" test. [read post]
